We're Testing Who? For What?

So, I get this email everyday from the NEA with short updates about a variety of stories regarding education. Today, this email included a blurb (info pulled from an article in Education Week) about elementary school teachers in Massachusetts having to take a math test in order to get (or keep) their certifications. Huh? Are we saying that currently there are elementary school teachers who can't do elementary math??? I sure hope not. To further dumbfound and amaze, they are also planning to give a "three year grace period" to any teacher who has trouble with this math test. WHAT?!?!??? How about escorting the knucklehead who can't pass an elementary level math test directly out the door? Do not pass go and, for goodness sake, do not collect $200! How, in the name of all that makes sense, can a teacher teach math to these students if he/she cannot accomplish the task? What about the kids who are getting sub-standard math education during this three year grace period? Are they just supposed to catch up later when they have a competent human standing in front of the room? Well, it doesn't work that way. If we're going to compete globally, education is going to have to do a hell of a lot better than that. Shame on any state who doesn't assure that teachers are knowledgeable in the areas they are responsible for teaching. And shame on any teacher for standing in front of a group of children with the promise of education on your lips when you can't pass a 5th grade math test. I am disgusted. :/